RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify barriers and facilitators to accessing post-stroke rehabilitation services six months after discharge from the stroke unit of a Brazilian public hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional and descriptive study collected sociodemographic and clinical-functional data during hospitalization. Then, barriers and facilitators for accessing the post-stroke rehabilitation services were collected six months after discharge. We considered economic conditions and displacement, the quality and organization of post-stroke rehabilitation services, and personal conditions. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were included. Among the 20 aspects analyzed, 17 (85.0%) were reported as facilitators, while three (15.0%) were as barriers. The identified barriers included financial income available for healthcare (49.4%), waiting time to schedule or to be seen (47.0%), and process to scheduling (45.4%). The main facilitators (> 79.0%) were the expectation of the patient with the treatment and assistance from family and friends. Moreover, most patients indicated as facilitators all aspects related to the quality of post-stroke rehabilitation services. CONCLUSION: Access to post-stroke rehabilitation services presented more facilitators than barriers. Public policies to subsidize health costs, optimize waiting time, and process for scheduling post-stroke rehabilitation services should be considered to reduce barriers. Likewise, human and financial resources must promote the facilitators.
Public policies to subsidize health costs, optimize waiting times and scheduling in post-stroke rehabilitation services should be considered to facilitate access to rehabilitation services for post-stroke patients.The involvement of family and friends in the treatment of post-stroke patients should be encouraged.Patients' motivation and positive expectations can facilitate access to post-stroke rehabilitation services.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare access to rehabilitation professionals by individuals with stroke one month after hospital discharge from a stroke unit in Brazil, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal and prospective study included individuals aged 20 years or older without previous disabilities admitted into a stroke unit due to a first stroke. Individuals were divided into two groups: before (G1) and during (G2) the COVID-19 pandemic. Groups were matched for age, sex, education level, socioeconomic status, and stroke severity. One month after hospital discharge, individuals were contacted via telephone to collect data regarding their access to rehabilitation services based on the number of referred rehabilitation professionals. Then, between-group comparisons were conducted (α = 5%). RESULTS: The access to rehabilitation professionals was similar between groups. Rehabilitation professionals accessed included medical doctors, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech therapists. The first consultation after hospital discharge was mainly provided by public services. Despite the pandemic, telehealth was not frequent in any period evaluated. In both groups, the number of accessed professionals (G1 = 110 and G2 = 90) was significantly lower than the number of referrals (G1 = 212 and G2 = 194; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Access to rehabilitation professionals was similar between groups. However, the number of accessed rehabilitation professionals was lower than that of referred ones during both periods. This finding indicates a compromised comprehensiveness of care for individuals with stroke, regardless of the pandemic.
